Connect supplied Advanced Fremen Ecaz two-sietch victory allowance
This commit is contained in:
Quintine committed
1 parent
d438d923a3
commit
0315917987
7 files changed
+54
-17
No files matched your search
@@ -96,6 +96,11 @@ cleanup. Both have owned live controls and minimum legal AI; numeric/custody
|
||||
precedence interpretations are explicit. Two direct battle smokes and types pass;
|
||||
live isolated React declarations/selectors submit exact native payloads in Chromium.
|
||||
No broad suite, deployed acceptance or strategic AI work was run.
|
||||
**Advanced Fremen/Ecaz protected sietches cutover.** Supplied physical p32
|
||||
permits cooccupation in Habbanya as well as Tabr. The shared quote now feeds
|
||||
both public progress and actual turn-ten victory. Basic stays Tabr-only;
|
||||
solitary Ecaz and third-party blockers remain. One before/after native ending
|
||||
smoke and three Habbanya contract cases pass; no broad suite was run.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,30 @@
|
||||
# Ecaz victory implementation contract
|
||||
|
||||
The [14 September runtime follow-up](#fremen-final-turn-runtime-follow-up) connects
|
||||
the explicit Fremen/Ecaz Sietch Tabr exception. The original audit and its
|
||||
unimplemented Habbanya inference remain below as source context.
|
||||
Basic retains the [14 September Tabr-only runtime](#fremen-final-turn-runtime-follow-up).
|
||||
Advanced now follows the authorized supplied revision's physical p32 allowance
|
||||
in both protected sietches. The publisher audit below remains historical context.
|
||||
|
||||
## Authorized Advanced two-sietch allowance — 8 October 2026
|
||||
|
||||
`UNOFFICIAL_Revised_Dune_Rulebook_v.2.3_web.pdf`, physical **p32,
|
||||
Fremen I**, permits “Fremen forces (± coexisting Ecaz forces) or no one”
|
||||
in **Sietch Tabr and Habbanya Sietch**. This is an explicit Advanced
|
||||
source cutover, not a newly located publisher symmetry ruling.
|
||||
|
||||
The shared `fremenSpecialVictory` quote now ignores reciprocal allied
|
||||
Ecaz cooccupation in either protected sietch when both factions actually
|
||||
have fighters there. Basic stays Tabr-only. Solitary/nonallied Ecaz and
|
||||
third-faction fighters still block; other Tuek/final-turn/ordinary-winner/
|
||||
prediction/fallback conditions do not change. Public progress and real
|
||||
victory evaluation consume the same quote without another decision.
|
||||
|
||||
One native Collection-to-Mentat smoke reproduces the old Guild fallback,
|
||||
then awards Fremen/Ecaz on the same Advanced board while preserving
|
||||
Basic and solitary-Ecaz exclusions. Three Habbanya contract cases pass.
|
||||
No broad suite or deployed acceptance was run.
|
||||
|
||||
**Superseded for Advanced:** the Habbanya rows below predate the authorized
|
||||
supplied p32 cutover above. Basic still follows the Tabr-only audit.
|
||||
|
||||
Primary-source review, 2026-09-07. This separates the explicit three-stronghold rule from its ordinary control and prediction consequences. No combat-rounding decision is needed for a victory predicate operating on an already-settled board. The unrelated rounding conflict remains as corrected in [Ecaz Occupy rules](ECAZ_OCCUPY_RULES.md).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -38,7 +60,7 @@ Stronghold Cards are benefits held between end-turn settlements, not additional
|
||||
|
||||
Base p.16 requires Sietch Tabr and Habbanya Sietch to be empty or occupied only by Fremen for its last-turn special victory. The November FAQ p.5 expressly says ordinary allied forces do not count as Fremen for this restriction. E3 p.15 then specifically allows **Ecaz and Fremen co-occupying Sietch Tabr**. [Base p.16](https://www.gf9games.com/dunegame/wp-content/uploads/Dune-Rulebook.pdf#page=16), [November FAQ p.5](https://www.gf9games.com/dune/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Dune-FAQ-Nov-2020.pdf#page=5), [E3 p.15](https://www.gf9games.com/dune/wp-content/uploads/EcazMoritani-Rulebook-LOWRES.pdf#page=15)
|
||||
|
||||
The supported narrow implementation requires an actual reciprocal Ecaz/Fremen alliance and Fremen presence **in that same territory** before ignoring Ecaz's additional presence. Ecaz alone in Sietch Tabr does not meet the stated co-occupation exception. Presence of any further faction remains disqualifying. A blanket `p.faction === 'ecaz'` exemption would permit non-allied or solitary Ecaz and is not justified by the FAQ.
|
||||
The supported narrow implementation requires an actual reciprocal Ecaz/Fremen alliance and Fremen presence **in that same territory** before ignoring Ecaz's additional presence. Ecaz alone in Sietch Tabr does not meet the stated co-occupation exception. Presence of any further faction remains disqualifying. A blanket `p.faction === 'ecaz'` exemption would permit non-allied or solitary Ecaz and is not justified by the FAQ. Advanced supersedes the Tabr-only scope above.
|
||||
|
||||
| Protected territory occupants | Result and evidence |
|
||||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ dedicated retrieved worked FAQs. [Contract and remaining limits](HOMEWORLD_OCCUP
|
||||
| Moritani Advanced assassination preview | After an eligible battle loss, a different opposing-faction Traitor Card may be revealed even if its leader is already dead (zero bounty). Face-up set-aside and one private replacement occur during Mentat; one use per faction. Normal-call duration, uniform hidden-eligibility UX and exceptional combinations remain explicit. | [Runtime/source contract](MORITANI_ASSASSINATE_LEADERS.md) |
|
||||
| Moritani Extortion at Mentat | The user selected normal Terror placement/relocation first, including any Karama response; only then collect the reserved five bank spice and approach other players in storm order for a possible three-spice payment. Payment removes the token; all declines recover it with rotated hidden supply IDs. The relative placement timing is a user-selected interpretation, not a publisher ruling. | [Publisher sequence and selected timing](MORITANI_EXTORTION_RULES.md#mentat-ordering-selected-interpretation-not-a-publisher-ruling) |
|
||||
| Ecaz Ambassador / Moritani Terror shared entry | In bounded classic plus Ecaz/Moritani Basic/Advanced games and the exact original paired native Nexus envelopes, both originally eligible owners resolve optional reactions in current storm order; committed entry, payment and counters do not replay. Later alliances do not erase the original trigger; physical effect prerequisites are rechecked. This remains an explicit provisional interpretation, not a located publisher priority ruling. An original accompanying counter joining existing BG fighters creates its own qualifying entry only after earlier Intrusion/income finish; exempt advisors, competing live reactions, unsupported children and Atomics retain guards. The Terror entry itself is now deferred behind the arrival's own interaction (Guild income, BG fighter Intrusion or BG advisor choice, Fremen storm protection) in an additive pending record that never replays payment or force transfer; a Terror entry already in flight and every Ambassador combination still reject. | [Primary-source gap and selected policy](MORITANI_ENTRY_TIMING.md#selected-bounded-overlap-order--29-september-2026), [exact paired composition](MORITANI_ENTRY_TIMING.md#paired-native-nexus-composition--7-october-2026), [deferred arrival entry](MORITANI_ENTRY_TIMING.md#deferred-arrival-entry-behind-the-arrivals-own-interactions--7-october-2026), [movement recovery](DEFERRED_MOVEMENT_ARRIVAL.md#bounded-storm-order-continuation--29-september-2026) |
|
||||
| Fremen/Ecaz final-turn victory | Reciprocal allied Ecaz and Fremen with fighters in Sietch Tabr do not block the Fremen special victory. Ecaz alone/non-allied or a third faction still blocks. The Habbanya extension remains unsupported; ordinary winner/prediction and fallback order are preserved. | [Explicit FAQ and runtime](ECAZ_VICTORY_RULES.md#fremen-final-turn-runtime-follow-up) |
|
||||
| Fremen/Ecaz final-turn victory | Basic keeps reciprocal cooccupation at Tabr only. Authorized supplied Advanced physical p32 Fremen I permits both Tabr and Habbanya when Fremen/Ecaz actually coexist. Solitary/nonallied Ecaz and third parties still block; ordinary winner/prediction/fallback order is preserved. | [Current source cutover](ECAZ_VICTORY_RULES.md) |
|
||||
| Truthtrance recorded knowledge | Questions compare an already recorded BG prediction, active submitted storm dial or actually known native Fremen forecast. Missing knowledge is unknown; only the aggregate answer is published. No future promise or unknown deck peek is created. | [Connected predicates and evidence](TRUTHTRANCE_KNOWLEDGE.md) |
|
||||
| Nexus lifecycle | Twelve physical cards, phase draw/replacement and alliance forfeiture; native Cunning, absent-faction Secret Ally and Betrayal have separate effects. No blanket Karama immunity. | [Common source contract](NEXUS_CARD_RULES.md), [lifecycle runtime](NEXUS_CARD_RUNTIME.md) |
|
||||
| Nexus faction effects | Preserve physical custody, original faction identity and durable effect receipts; use each printed family instead of borrowing another faction's rules by analogy. | [Atreides](NEXUS_ATREIDES_RULES.md), [Harkonnen](NEXUS_HARKONNEN_RULES.md), [BG](NEXUS_BENE_GESSERIT_RULES.md), [Emperor](NEXUS_EMPEROR_RULES.md), [Fremen](NEXUS_FREMEN_RULES.md), [Guild](NEXUS_GUILD_RULES.md) |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user