Allow Residual Poison after Cunning inspections
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
0c848bec74
commit
18bf5d4423
13 files changed
+944
-156
No files matched your search
@@ -70,42 +70,68 @@ The unresolved cases were reported to the coordinator before implementation deci
|
||||
|
||||
## Residual Poison and two inspected commitments
|
||||
|
||||
The following is a reasoned counterexample from the existing preparation rules,
|
||||
not a reported executed gameplay regression. In Advanced play, CHOAM has four
|
||||
ordinary forces in the battle, no spice, one living usable leader, a projectile,
|
||||
Ghola and a real Karama, and its cash-in power is unused. Suppose native
|
||||
Prescience fixed the dial at three and Cunning fixed the projectile. Before a
|
||||
leader death, both answers are reachable: cashing Ghola supplies three spice,
|
||||
enough to support the dial, while the living leader permits the projectile.
|
||||
**Selected provisional composition — 26 October 2026.** The 14 October
|
||||
choose-recommended authority supersedes the earlier blanket product refusal.
|
||||
The printed Residual Poison window remains available after two completed
|
||||
nonleader Cunning inspections, before either combatant commits a leader.
|
||||
Active interactions and exact card commitments still resolve as required.
|
||||
This does not make leader-valued inspection commitments poisonable.
|
||||
|
||||
If Residual Poison kills that last leader, each answer can remain feasible by
|
||||
itself. Keeping the projectile permits Ghola revival with a lower dial. Keeping
|
||||
the dial permits cash-in while omitting the weapon. Keeping both cannot spend
|
||||
the same Ghola both on revival and on funding, nor cash the committed projectile.
|
||||
There is therefore no generally valid assumption that an earlier answer, a later
|
||||
answer, or all individually feasible answers identify the uniquely correct
|
||||
surviving set. The retrieved publisher rules do not select between these sets.
|
||||
Resolve the one actual random eligible leader death and discard first. Use the
|
||||
same existing reconciliation already used after canceled Sardaukar enhancement:
|
||||
|
||||
The coordinator has asked whether the affected player should choose the retained
|
||||
commitment, the earlier commitment should take priority, or this combination
|
||||
should await an official ruling. The answer is pending. No such priority is
|
||||
implemented by this document. Until resolved, the runtime uses an explicit
|
||||
development boundary: Residual Poison is unavailable after an answered Cunning
|
||||
inspection. This guard depends on the publicly played mode and completion stage,
|
||||
not the opponent's hidden cards, spice, or whether a private feasibility search
|
||||
happens to find a conflict. It is not a printed prohibition. The independent
|
||||
leader-commitment restriction still applies, and this boundary does not prohibit
|
||||
the single-element Secret Ally continuation.
|
||||
1. Test the original native nonleader answer without obsolete extra bindings
|
||||
or Truthtrance. Keep it if a legal prepared plan can still honor it.
|
||||
2. Test the extra Cunning answer jointly with any retained native answer. If
|
||||
no legal plan honors both, reopen the extra answer's original field.
|
||||
3. If the native answer itself is impossible, reopen both current bindings.
|
||||
Answer its original field first, then the extra field through the original
|
||||
saved protocol, so the old extra binding cannot constrain the renewed native
|
||||
choice.
|
||||
4. Reconcile Truthtrance only after retiring the impossible inspection bindings.
|
||||
Keep earlier private observations and the spent Nexus receipt; re-answering
|
||||
changes neither field selection nor card cost. Never redraw the victim,
|
||||
restore a dead leader or repeat the discard to save a commitment.
|
||||
|
||||
Any later implementation should test complete legal continuations with the
|
||||
proposed retired bindings removed on private copies. Testing one binding while
|
||||
another impossible binding remains can falsely release a valid dial. Likewise,
|
||||
reconciling Truthtrance before retiring an impossible inspection can wrongly
|
||||
release an otherwise feasible promise. Preserve historical disclosures and the
|
||||
consumed Nexus receipt separately from active bindings; a renewed answer is to
|
||||
the original field and does not consume another card. Multiple incomparable
|
||||
maximal surviving sets must not acquire an unexplained software tie-break.
|
||||
The ordered pair reopening when native becomes impossible applies to Residual
|
||||
Poison, including its original discard continuation. Sardaukar cancellation
|
||||
retains its existing still-feasible other answer. The native-first priority is
|
||||
an explicit online interpretation, not a retrieved publisher choice among
|
||||
incomparable surviving answer sets. The earlier source
|
||||
question is not a separately answered publisher ruling. Ordinary single-element
|
||||
Secret Ally and native inspection paths continue to use their existing rules.
|
||||
|
||||
The focused [public-guard regression](../tests/nexus-residual-ambiguity.test.ts)
|
||||
covers the declared implementation boundary and hidden-state independence. It
|
||||
does not claim to execute or resolve the counterexample above.
|
||||
A resource-exclusive example motivates the joint check: Advanced CHOAM can have
|
||||
four ordinary battle forces, no spice, one usable living leader, a projectile,
|
||||
Ghola and the one Karama needed to activate its unused cash-in power. Native
|
||||
dial3 and Cunning projectile may both be reachable before death by selling
|
||||
Ghola for support. After that last usable leader dies, Ghola cannot both be
|
||||
sold for support and revive a leader for the projectile. Keeping native dial3
|
||||
permits an unarmed plan after cash-in; keeping the projectile alone can permit
|
||||
revival with a lower dial. The special-activation Karama is not a second freely
|
||||
saleable funding card. The controlled regression must execute the real actions
|
||||
and check reachable continuations rather than treating this prose as proof.
|
||||
|
||||
[Controlled reconciliation evidence](../tests/nexus-residual-ambiguity.test.ts)
|
||||
is separate from [the genuine acquisition/Nexus/battle source](../tests/fixture-residual-cunning.ts)
|
||||
and [its runtime cases](../tests/residual-cunning-engine.test.ts).
|
||||
Complete combinations and final assurance remain open.
|
||||
|
||||
## Focused prototype evidence — 26 October 2026
|
||||
|
||||
Frozen17-file131/131, types/lint/build and five engine/GameTable SSR journeys
|
||||
pass. Genuine public Basic108/Advanced120-action sources really buy Residual1,
|
||||
draw the original Atreides Nexus, ship Richese1 into Arrakeen and answer both
|
||||
fields. The actual random death preserves both feasible answers; each battle
|
||||
finishes legally. Separate controlled Advanced resource/leader seams execute
|
||||
both resource-exclusive priorities and impossible-native ordered re-answers,
|
||||
including actual cash-in, Ghola and battle. All45 physical Treachery and12 Nexus
|
||||
cards remain. Seven native cases, four controlled engine cases and six rendering
|
||||
supplements include four-profile legal participation and existing cancellation
|
||||
compatibility. Controlled setup is not original acquisition proof.
|
||||
|
||||
Report/logs: `/home/quintine/.local/share/dune/checkpoints/20261026-residual-cunning-proof-v3/`;
|
||||
journeys/HTML: adjacent `20261026-residual-cunning-runtime/`.
|
||||
No saved-room/D1/server, deployment/restart or recovery operation. No DOM/
|
||||
hydration, browser/mobile or clicked-control acceptance; complete combinations,
|
||||
full rules and final assurance remain due.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user