Verify native zero-marker battle continuation

docs/ECAZ_TREACHERY_RULES.md

@@ -170,6 +170,18 @@ now have connected development prototypes. The linked contracts supersede the
 historical runtime-absence statements above within their explicit boundaries.
 Reinforcements and complete combined-module acceptance remain unfinished.
 
+## Reinforcements Traitor source recheck — 29 October 2026
+
+The [publisher-authored base rulebook](https://cdn.1j1ju.com/medias/37/57/71-dune-rulebook.pdf#page=11)
+states that a successful Traitor caller loses nothing regardless of battle
+plans. The later printed Reinforcements face requires three reserves moved to
+Tanks; the Ecaz & Moritani rulebook's Treachery FAQ discusses Harass, without a
+direct Reinforcements/Traitor clarification found in the reviewed material.
+Both precedence readings remain plausible. The existing all-outcome charge is
+still provisional; this recheck does not establish a publisher ruling or a
+user decision. The older designer-linked April 2020 FAQ could not be inspected:
+the publisher server returned HTTP 403, and its date predates the expansion.
+
 ## 14 September Reinforcements cost review
 
 The printed close-up at [4:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9ZTV1uZqsM&t=264s)