Extend conditional battle questions across previews

docs/TRUTHTRANCE_TURN_ACTIONS.md

@@ -2,19 +2,20 @@
 
 ## Conditional next-battle leader question — 28 October 2026
 
-**Prototyped / Partial.** In a quiet Basic Storm, Spice Blow, Charity, Bidding, Revival or Shipment and Movement window with
-classic or expansion factions, no Ecaz and no optional modules, a player can ask whether another
+**Prototyped / Partial.** In a quiet Storm, Spice Blow, Charity, Bidding,
+Revival or Shipment and Movement window, a player can ask whether another
 player will use a named native leader in that player's first later battle this
 turn, if one occurs. A definite answer creates a waiting receipt; it does not
-require a shipment, movement or battle. At the first actual battle involving
-that player the receipt binds its real battle event and uses the native plan
+require a shipment, movement or battle. At the first actual battle for which
+that player submits a plan, the receipt binds its real battle event and uses the native plan
 validator and guidance. If no battle occurs, the receipt expires when Battle
 ends. An independently impossible answer is released by the existing battle
 promise reconciliation. Another structured action answer for that respondent
 is guarded while the conditional answer is active; broader promise composition,
-Ecaz, optional modules and Advanced are not supported here. Ecaz's combined
-battle may select a different lead after scheduling, so it needs its own binding
-and expiry treatment before this question can be enabled in those games.
+optional modules and Advanced Ecaz are not supported here. In Basic Ecaz's
+combined battle, the selected lead and opponent bind only after the Occupy
+cancellation response has resolved. The nonleading ally remains waiting for
+its own later battle; this plan-owner interpretation is provisional.
 Storm requires its original post-dial, pre-movement window; Spice Blow requires
 the original pre-draw window with no Nexus or worm continuation. During these
 windows, Charity, Bidding and Revival, definite answers use currently available native leaders or
@@ -28,13 +29,19 @@ provisional online interpretations, not specific publisher rulings. The
 [Bidding continuation tests](../tests/truth-future-battle-bidding.test.ts) and
 [Storm/Spice continuation tests](../tests/truth-future-battle-early.test.ts),
 plus [Basic expansion tests](../tests/truth-future-battle-leader-expansions.test.ts),
+[Basic Ecaz tests](../tests/truth-future-battle-leader-ecaz.test.ts) and
+[Advanced tests](../tests/truth-future-battle-leader-advanced.test.ts),
 exercise both answers and expiry without inventing a battle.
 
 The Basic expansion widening has focused coverage of CHOAM's Yes and No in
 actual battles and a Richese physical discard, Semuta pass and no-battle
 expiry, plus all four minimal answer profiles. The Ecaz guard uses a staged
-seat; it is not an Ecaz game journey. Semuta exchange, other expansion-faction
-battle interactions, Advanced and optional modules remain unverified.
+seat; it is not an Advanced Ecaz game journey. The Advanced tests cover a
+classic paid-support battle and an Ixian battle. The Basic Ecaz lead and
+allowed/canceled Occupy cases use genuine setup, real questions and battles,
+with staged physical cards, rival forces and shipment budgets. Ten related
+test files pass 75 cases. Semuta exchange, other expansion-faction battle
+interactions, Advanced Ecaz and optional modules remain unverified.
 
 ## Printed flight and pre-leader cards — 27 October 2026