Connect physical Jacurutu allocation and cumulative station choices

This commit is contained in:
Quintine committed 2026-10-14 14:49:07 +11:00
1 parent 373badd560
commit 554f2bf9e9
22 files changed
+1943 -129

No files matched your search

+2 -2
View File
@@ -550,8 +550,8 @@ These are unresolved in the cited records. Do not infer an answer from elapsed t
| Moritani Atomics after alliance change | The publisher's persistent −1 hand-limit text names Moritani and “your ally,” but not whether the penalty follows a later ally, remains on the original ally or affects both. Requested online source searches found no clarification; the alliance-change case remains gated. | [Terror source boundary](MORITANI_TERROR_RULES.md#material-gaps-and-ordinary-compositions) |
| Moritani Sneak Attack entry classification | The printed verb is “Send”; no retrieved ruling classifies the off-planet reserve transfer as a shipment for other arrival powers. The engine now **explicitly adopts** the supported shipment composition: a positive Sneak Attack in Shipment and Movement accrues the Heighliners token once for its owner, then offers the Bene Gesserit Intrusion (Advanced, with fighters present) and the free spiritual-advisor shipment, with the committed Terror entry resolving first; a zero-force resolution accrues nothing and opens no reaction. This order is an implementation interpretation, not a publisher ruling. | [Source boundary and adopted classification](MORITANI_ASSASSINATION_SNEAK.md#adopted-shipment-classification-7-october-2026) |
| Orgiz collection | Basic retains the publisher-p13 per-blow ambiguity and provisional one-transfer-per-positive-deposit mapping. Authorized supplied Advanced rulebook physical24 instead says each time Collection occurs in a territory containing spice: Advanced applies one transfer per actual positive territory Collection, only to a unique rival payer. Multiple source keys do not add transfers. Contested ownership, inconsistent/different payers and Ecaz shared lots still withhold only uncertain transfers; ordinary Collection proceeds. No new publisher ruling on those pending cases is claimed. | [Advanced source cutover and Basic boundary](DISCOVERY_PROTOTYPE.md#authorized-advanced-collection-wording) |
| Jacurutu physical dial | The user question asks whether the losing player should choose the physical normal/elite forces represented by its dial. When legal Advanced allocations produce different rewards, income remains explicitly unpaid; numeric wheel subtraction is not a ruling. | [Discovery interpretations](DISCOVERY_PROTOTYPE.md#interpretations-retained-for-refinement) |
| Testing Station contest/timing | Only sole non-advisor occupation is prototyped. Two-occupant priority/stacking remains unresolved; opening after the ordinary storm-card window is an explicit source-timing inference. Weather Control is excluded by the printed text. | [Discovery interpretations](DISCOVERY_PROTOTYPE.md#interpretations-retained-for-refinement) |
| Jacurutu physical dial | Under the 14 October choose-recommendation priority, the prototype selects the defeated-player exact ordinary/elite/paid reading before settlement. Unique readings remain automatic; actual returned counters never earn income. This replaces the earlier unpaid gap without claiming a separate numerical user answer or publisher ruling. | [Recommended runtime and source](DISCOVERY_PROTOTYPE.md#recommended-physical-dial-and-cumulative-storm-choices--14-october-2026) |
| Testing Station contest/timing | The 14 October recommended prototype gives each non-advisor occupant one cumulative adjustment in original storm order, after the ordinary card window and before a single traversal. Original source/base and Weather immunity stay unchanged. Ordering/stacking is explicit provisional interpretation, not a newly found publisher answer. | [Recommended runtime and source](DISCOVERY_PROTOTYPE.md#recommended-physical-dial-and-cumulative-storm-choices--14-october-2026) |
| CHOAM Secret Ally battle timing | The printed after-victory inspection is optional and the Nexus identity stays secret. The connected prototype chooses a uniform use-or-continue window for every winner when Nexus is enabled and CHOAM absent; nonholders pass, while a holder may decide after the result. This privacy-preserving prompt is a product inference, not publisher text. A holder-only pause would reveal custody and a precommitment would remove the printed choice. Ordinary Karama cancellation remains unestablished by retrieved sources; no response is invented. | [After-victory inspection boundary](NEXUS_CHOAM_SECRET_ALLY.md#after-victory-inspection-audit) |
| Moritani Secret Ally battle timing | The printed after-loss retention is optional and the Nexus card remains secret. The connected prototype offers the same choice to every loser when Moritani is absent and at least one publicly revealed played card is retainable; a loser with no eligible public card has no useful choice, independent of hidden custody. Only an unallied holder may spend the physical card. This prompt is a privacy-preserving product inference, not publisher timing text. Native Moritani alliance retention and its Karama response remain separate; no generic Secret Ally counter is invented. | [Nexus retention boundary](NEXUS_CARD_RULES.md#moritani-secret-ally-retention-timing) |
| Ecaz Secret Ally traitor inquiry | The printed panel asks one selected player whether they hold any of the holder's leaders as Traitors, without identifying a leader; it specifies neither native-versus-controlled scope nor answer audience. The connected prototype chooses native printed faction leaders (including dead/captured), ordinary Traitor Cards rather than Face Dancers, and a holder-only historical yes/no. This is a privacy-preserving product interpretation, **not** a publisher ruling. Foreign Ghola/captive scope and table-wide disclosure remain release boundaries. | [Ecaz inquiry source and bounded runtime](NEXUS_ECAZ_RULES.md#bounded-secret-ally-traitor-inquiry-runtime) |