Compose source-clear Basic even-force Ecaz Occupy

docs/CURRENT_STATUS.md

@@ -16,6 +16,40 @@ open mode gates.
 
 ## Current checkpoint and work
 
+**Basic Ecaz Occupy even-force — bounded Development Verified:**
+fresh Basic `ecaz-occupy` now admits native Ecaz with classic or optional
+Moritani opponents and the exact `ecaz` deck, no optional modules. Genuine
+setup, original Nexus/worm alliance, shipments, Karama and Collection remain
+native; older played Basic tables are not retrofitted. For an even Ecaz force
+count the publisher page-8 paragraph and the page-15 example agree, so the
+contribution and ordinary-win Ecaz losses are E/2. Their odd-count examples
+still contradict each other, so an uncanceled odd Basic count is rejected at
+the original battle choice before any lead frame is saved — not rounded,
+canceled or replaced. Advanced keeps its separately authorized ceiling
+arithmetic. Basic has no Emperor/Fremen elite inventory and its supplied
+support normalizes to zero, so the shared editor blocks nonzero support rather
+than inventing a Basic payment rule.
+The pure coalition quote now requires an explicit `advanced` band with no
+default or alias; every production re-quote caller passes the actual band.
+Affected Basic/helper cases47/47, the affected Advanced/CLI union352/352 on a
+stable tree, types and lint pass. Five genuine Basic two-through-six-seat games
+were run: four complete with 2,090 accepted actions, no rejections and 54 JSON
+continuations; four-seat seed **20261299** is captured at the preserved
+odd-count conflict after 321 accepted actions. It is not rerun or bypassed.
+Those four completed natural games contain no coalition lead choice, so the
+actual coalition arithmetic evidence comes from the controlled programs and the
+human path. Authenticated human390px **FEJ6SBFB v14** kept the admitted
+Ecaz/Guild/Emperor seats and native wallets, then used a conserved even-force
+board after a genuine Nexus alliance. The table showed the correct Basic labels:
+a total-dial slider bounded2..6 (2 fixed Ecaz strength for four Ecaz forces,
+variable pool Guild's four) with no spice-support control. Real sealed plans
+(Ecaz Sanya4 plus total dial4 against Emperor Hasimir6) produced an8–6 Ecaz win;
+the log and state record Ecaz's two mandatory Occupy casualties, Guild's two
+variable casualties, and the Emperor's eight territory forces to the Tanks. Every
+seat remains at20 physical forces after refresh. See
+[Basic even-force source](ECAZ_OCCUPY_RULES.md#basic-even-force-composition--4-october-2026).
+Full combinations/assurance/public/deployed acceptance remain open.
+
 **Native Ecaz ordinary-disc Skills — bounded Development Verified:**
 fresh Basic/Advanced Ecaz with classic opponents retains the exact `ecaz` deck,
 all fourteen skills, five native assignment discs and original Loyalty/setup.

docs/ECAZ_OCCUPY_RULES.md

@@ -1,6 +1,49 @@
-# Ecaz Occupy: Advanced source and historical conflict
+# Ecaz Occupy: Basic and Advanced source, and historical conflict
 
-Historical primary-source audit, 2026-09-07, corrected after independent verification. The old publisher/designer casualty-rounding conflict remains unresolved as a publisher correction and for Basic. Its earlier false attribution to Jack Reda is still withdrawn. The later user-authorized Advanced source below selects explicit Advanced arithmetic; it does not retroactively certify that attribution.
+Historical primary-source audit, 2026-09-07, corrected after independent verification. The old publisher/designer casualty-rounding conflict remains unresolved as a publisher correction and for odd Basic counts. Its earlier false attribution to Jack Reda is still withdrawn. The later user-authorized Advanced source below selects explicit Advanced arithmetic, and the Basic even-force composition selects E/2 for even counts; neither retroactively certifies that attribution.
+
+## Basic even-force composition — 4 October 2026
+
+Fresh local `ecaz-occupy` now admits Basic as well as Advanced. Basic uses the
+exact `ecaz` Treachery deck with classic or optional Moritani opponents and no
+optional cards or modules. Genuine setup, original Nexus/worm alliance,
+shipments, Karama and Collection remain native; older played Basic tables are
+not retrofitted.
+
+For an even Ecaz force count the publisher page-8 general paragraph and the
+page-15 example agree: contribution and ordinary-win Ecaz losses are E/2, and
+E/2 survive. The two pages still contradict each other for odd counts, so an
+uncanceled odd Basic count is rejected at the original battle choice before a
+lead frame is saved. It is not silently rounded, canceled or replaced with
+another fight. Advanced keeps its separately authorized ceiling arithmetic.
+
+Basic has no Emperor/Fremen elite inventory (elites require Advanced or
+Homeworlds), and the engine normalizes a supplied Basic support amount to zero
+rather than inventing paid Basic support. The shared editor therefore blocks
+nonzero support; no additional Basic payment rule is created. Native Karama
+after the lead choice, selected-lead own-pool cancellation, original winner
+cards, traitor/mutual/explosion outcomes, joint three-stronghold coexistence and
+original Mentat victory all use the existing handlers.
+
+Focused source-band cases plus native runtime cases cover E2/E4 under both
+leads, free full-strength ordinary commitments, typed Basic Fedaykin/Sardaukar
+strength-one casualties, cancellation under both leads, and the four legal
+policies. Five genuine Basic two-through-six-seat games were run: four complete
+with 2,090 accepted actions, no rejections and 54 JSON continuations; the
+four-seat game is captured at the preserved odd-count conflict and is not rerun
+or bypassed. Four completed natural games contain no coalition lead choice, so
+the actual coalition arithmetic evidence comes from the controlled programs and
+the human path rather than those games.
+
+Authenticated human390px **FEJ6SBFB v14** kept the admitted Ecaz/Guild/Emperor
+seats and native wallets, then staged a conserved even-force board after the
+genuine Nexus alliance. The table showed the correct Basic labels: a total-dial
+slider bounded 2..6 (2 fixed Ecaz strength for four Ecaz forces plus Guild's
+four-force variable pool) with no spice-support control. Real sealed plans —
+Ecaz Sanya Ecaz 4 with total dial 4 against Emperor Hasimir Fenring 6 — produced
+an 8–6 Ecaz win. The log and saved state record Ecaz's two mandatory Occupy
+casualties, Guild's two variable casualties, and the Emperor's eight territory
+forces to the Tanks; every seat remains at 20 physical forces after refresh.
 
 ## Authorized Advanced cutover — 2 October 2026
 
@@ -232,7 +275,7 @@ Ecaz losses on ordinary allied win = ceil(E / 2)
 Ecaz survivors on ordinary allied win = floor(E / 2)
 ```
 
-The historical publisher/mirror example still conflicts for E=5, and the earlier audits correctly record that publisher gap. Basic still needs a supported interpretation. Advanced now uses the separately user-authorized source cutover above: its explicit ceil contribution and floor survivors select the arithmetic without claiming a designer correction. Fixed Ecaz losses stay independent of the ally's variable dial losses.
+The historical publisher/mirror example still conflicts for E=5, and the earlier audits correctly record that publisher gap. Basic now has the bounded even-force composition above: E/2 is source-clear for even counts, and the still-contradictory odd counts are rejected rather than rounded. Advanced uses the separately user-authorized source cutover above: its explicit ceil contribution and floor survivors select the arithmetic without claiming a designer correction. Fixed Ecaz losses stay independent of the ally's variable dial losses.
 
 ## Occupation, controller and battle order
 
@@ -285,4 +328,4 @@ Implement a pure, owner-labelled Occupy battle profile shared by validation, AI,
 
 Acceptance examples should include Ecaz counts 1–5, either selected faction, all three relative storm positions, both win/loss outcomes, Basic/Advanced supported dials, Fremen free strength, advisor-only BG exclusion, printed and BG-converted cancellation, and JSON recovery after selection. Separate targeted follow-ups should cover the source-scoped special battle effects above, agreed/default desert allocation, Advanced Collection, and actual three-co-occupied victory. Keep the optional Homeworld/Nexus/Discovery modifiers explicitly outside the initial profile until their own faces and outcomes are wired; no ordinary Occupy rule may be used to bypass them.
 
-The September audit changed no runtime and corrected the false designer attribution. The October Advanced cutover above is separate; Basic, optional/exotic interactions and independently unanswered cancellation details retain their historical boundaries.
+The September audit changed no runtime and corrected the false designer attribution. The October Advanced cutover and the October Basic even-force composition above are separate; optional/exotic interactions and independently unanswered cancellation details retain their historical boundaries.

docs/IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md

@@ -1,5 +1,65 @@
 # Dune implementation status
 
+## 4 October 2026 — Basic even-force Ecaz Occupy composition
+
+Two bounded owners supplied the source-band coalition quote and native Basic
+runtime cases. One integration owner admitted Basic, migrated production
+re-quotes, corrected a genuine total-dial validation gap and connected the CLI
+help, canonical guide and source records.
+
+The coalition quote now requires an explicit `advanced` boolean with no default
+or alias. Active Basic requires an even Ecaz count and uses E/2 for the mandatory
+contribution and ordinary-win Ecaz losses; Advanced keeps its ceiling arithmetic.
+Canceled Basic permits the preserved odd count through the original own-pool
+cancellation frame with zero fixed strength. The publisher page-8 paragraph and
+page-15 example still contradict each other for odd counts, so an uncanceled odd
+Basic battle is rejected at the original choice before a lead frame exists. It is
+not rounded, canceled or replaced. Basic has no Emperor/Fremen elite inventory
+(elites require Advanced or Homeworlds), and the engine normalizes a supplied
+Basic support amount to zero rather than inventing paid Basic support; the shared
+editor blocks nonzero support.
+
+A genuine defect surfaced during integration: Basic `validatePlan` bounded the
+dial by the ordinary own pool before the coalition quote ran, so a legal total
+such as six was rejected. The quoted-force branch now includes the actual Occupy
+profile, and the Basic Prescience numeric dial branch includes the coalition
+lead; native feasibility still validates the exact total. The board projection
+gains an optional public Basic-coalition flag so only fresh Basic tables collapse
+the pair into one battle side; older played Basic games are not retrofitted.
+
+The Basic fixture originally borrowed a wallet so the rival could afford its
+eight-force sand shipment. Removing that artificial wallet exposed the real
+unaffordable shipment; the fixture now transfers eight original rival reserves
+to the battlefield after the genuine Nexus instead, keeping native wallets,
+phases, alliance, plans and receipts. The genuine Basic fixture does not accept
+an authenticated lobby yet; the authenticated staging path is separate.
+
+Affected Basic/helper cases47/47 and the affected Advanced/CLI union352/352 on a
+stable tree pass with types/lint. Five genuine Basic two-through-six-seat games
+were run: four complete with 2,090 accepted actions, no rejections and 54 JSON
+continuations; four-seat seed **20261299** is captured at the preserved
+odd-count conflict after 321 accepted actions. The captured game, report, state
+and trace remain outside the checkout and are not rerun or bypassed. The four
+completed natural games contain no coalition lead choice, so the coalition
+arithmetic evidence comes from the controlled programs and the human path, not
+from those games.
+
+Authenticated human390px **FEJ6SBFB v14** kept the admitted Ecaz/Guild/Emperor
+seats and native wallets, then staged a conserved even-force board after the
+genuine Nexus alliance. The table showed the correct Basic labels: a total-dial
+slider bounded 2..6 (2 fixed Ecaz strength for four Ecaz forces plus Guild's
+four-force variable pool) with no spice-support control. Real sealed plans —
+Ecaz Sanya Ecaz 4 with total dial 4 against Emperor Hasimir Fenring 6 — produced
+an 8–6 Ecaz win. The log and saved state record Ecaz's two mandatory Occupy
+casualties, Guild's two variable casualties, and the Emperor's eight territory
+forces to the Tanks; every seat remains at 20 physical forces after refresh.
+The Basic Karama window, lead choice, plan editor and Collection continuation all
+use the existing shared controls.
+
+No natural-history claim for controlled positions, reset, public activation,
+full-mode certification or deployed evidence; live **ab5c782** remains last
+observed.
+
 ## 4 October 2026 — native Ecaz ordinary-disc skills and temporary Duke composition
 
 Two bounded owners supplied native setup/ordinary rescue/revival/Ambassador

docs/RULE_DECISIONS.md

@@ -85,7 +85,22 @@ Public, faction, optional-module and full-mode readiness gates are unchanged.
 Secrecy (physical page 16), Duke Vidal's ghola exception (30), Kull and other
 independent decisions are not reconciled by this cutover.
 
-## Advanced Ecaz Occupy cutover — 2 October 2026
+## Basic Ecaz Occupy even-force boundary — 4 October 2026
+
+Fresh bounded `ecaz-occupy` now admits Basic with the exact `ecaz` deck and
+classic or optional Moritani opponents, no optional modules. For an even Ecaz
+force count the publisher page-8 paragraph and the page-15 example agree:
+contribution and ordinary-win Ecaz losses are E/2. Their odd-count examples
+still contradict each other, so an uncanceled odd Basic count is rejected at
+the original battle choice before any lead frame is saved; it is not rounded,
+canceled or replaced. Advanced keeps its separately authorized ceiling
+arithmetic. Basic has no Emperor/Fremen elite inventory and a supplied Basic
+support amount normalizes to zero, so the shared editor blocks nonzero support
+rather than creating a Basic payment rule. This is a source-bound composition,
+not a publisher correction. See the
+[Basic even-force contract](ECAZ_OCCUPY_RULES.md#basic-even-force-composition--4-october-2026).
+
+## Authorized Advanced Ecaz Occupy cutover — 2 October 2026
 
 The authorized supplied revision resolves the Advanced combined army:
 **Occupy B, physical PDF page 32** selects Ecaz or its current ally as lead.