Integrate sourced Treachery cards with Advanced Occupy
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
85caee6c83
commit
cd532222a5
21 files changed
+1226
-99
No files matched your search
@@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ legal plans for either lead, active or canceled.
|
||||
|
||||
The coherent affected rule/guide batch passes **173/173**. Current-source
|
||||
five unstaged2..6 games complete with2,123 accepted actions, no rejections
|
||||
and54JSON continuations, `sourceUnchanged:true`. No game sample triggers
|
||||
a combined lead choice: profile continuation is observed there, while the
|
||||
native cases and human rooms establish the actual combined rule path.
|
||||
and54JSON continuations, `sourceUnchanged:true`. Full `results.json` records
|
||||
one actual combined lead choice. Native cases and human rooms provide the
|
||||
explicit arithmetic, casualty and counter-path evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Native E1/E2 force-owner integration — 2 October 2026
|
||||
@@ -100,9 +100,9 @@ Native34 rule cases, coherent affected191/191, types/lint and19 actual program
|
||||
cases pass, including Ix substitution decline/prevention and zero/full whole
|
||||
co-side replacement. Twenty-three unstaged classic/paired/mixed2..6 games
|
||||
complete with13,004 accepted actions/no rejection and339JSON continuations,
|
||||
`sourceUnchanged:true`. They contain no combined lead choice; those samples
|
||||
prove profile continuation, not the rare rule transitions covered by native
|
||||
cases and human controls. Two scoped rule reviews find no defect.
|
||||
`sourceUnchanged:true`. Full `results.json` records three actual combined
|
||||
lead choices. Native cases and human controls additionally exercise the typed/
|
||||
replacement boundaries. Two scoped rule reviews find no defect.
|
||||
|
||||
Original CLI/human390px **5B4FW8D3 v12** let physical Ixians sacrifice two
|
||||
Suboids to recover two Cyborgs after an Ecaz-led plan; Ecaz retained its Shield
|
||||
@@ -112,6 +112,55 @@ returned Ecaz1/Guild2 to their own reserves, placed three Tleilaxu forces and
|
||||
retained the original Ecaz Slip Tip and bounty. Both continue the original
|
||||
phase rather than manufacturing another battle or card owner.
|
||||
|
||||
### Independent cards with combined armies — 2 October 2026
|
||||
|
||||
The existing fresh `ecaz-occupy` CLI accepts explicit `--ecaz-treachery`,
|
||||
independently selecting all three physical cards before the original setup:
|
||||
36 Ecaz-only,50 Ix,38 CHOAM,50 both. No default/public start or saved retrofit.
|
||||
|
||||
The printed E3p16 Harass FAQ returns only the card user's own undialed
|
||||
forces. An active Ecaz card user returns `floor(original E/2)` and retains
|
||||
the original `ceil(E/2)` free/full physical commitment; no ally support is
|
||||
charged to those fixed fighters. A selected ally uses its typed variable
|
||||
commitment after subtracting fixed strength. Canceled Occupy uses the lead's
|
||||
ordinary own pool. Opposing successful Traitor cancels returns; withdrawn
|
||||
reserves are outside later loss, explosion and FaceDance replacement.
|
||||
This is a composition of the own-only FAQ and authorized Advanced arithmetic,
|
||||
not a newly retrieved detailed Ecaz casualty FAQ.
|
||||
|
||||
Reinforcements uses the card user's own three normal-first reserve counters
|
||||
and existing +2 score-only modifier, not ally reserves, extra physical dial
|
||||
losses or support. Existing provisional all-revealed-outcome cost/disposal
|
||||
is unchanged and remains explicitly not a publisher ruling. Both slots and
|
||||
opposing holders work; own same-plan Harass/Reinforcements and Stone/optional
|
||||
module guards stay. Basic/unprofiled co-side card battles remain rejected.
|
||||
|
||||
Native/pure67 cases, relevant284-case batch and27 actual native-program
|
||||
cases pass, including all four legal policies. Two natural captured games
|
||||
exposed an existing mandatory-discard callback comparing casualties to the
|
||||
logical winner rather than physical owner. Correct owner and explicit fully
|
||||
committed Harass pool constraints now preserve the selected loss allocation.
|
||||
Both original captures continued to completion; no database reset or new
|
||||
recovery-audit campaign. Obsolete wording/log/default pins were deleted.
|
||||
Final scoped source/native reviews find no defect.
|
||||
|
||||
Current-source46 ordinary/variant2..6 games complete26,619 accepted actions/
|
||||
no rejection/696JSON continuations, source unchanged. Full `results.json`
|
||||
records9 actual combined lead choices; compact `report.json` lacks counters.
|
||||
Original CLI/human390px **T8T3ZYWH v12** sealed Ecaz Harass total5/support2,
|
||||
returned Ecaz2 reserves, sent original fixed3 to Tanks and left Guild2.
|
||||
**WW54BZGM v12** sealed total5/support2 with Reinforcements; its +2 won the
|
||||
real equal-leader comparison, paid three Ecaz reserves, left Ecaz2/Guild2 and
|
||||
sent six total Ecaz counters to Tanks. Both reach original Collection.
|
||||
|
||||
### Encounter evidence correction — 2 October 2026
|
||||
|
||||
Earlier “no combined lead choice” statements were incorrect: the compact
|
||||
`report.json` deliberately omits `used` counters. The immutable full
|
||||
`results.json` records1 choice in the five-game checkpoint and3 in the
|
||||
23-game checkpoint. Neither historical report is rewritten. The current
|
||||
46-game original/variant batch records9 actual combined lead choices.
|
||||
|
||||
## Provenance and attribution correction
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | Observed wording or correction | Authority and conclusion |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user