Integrate sourced Treachery cards with Advanced Occupy
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
85caee6c83
commit
cd532222a5
21 files changed
+1226
-99
No files matched your search
@@ -76,8 +76,11 @@ This is a legal strategy path, not strength calibration.
|
||||
winner. A user question has been sent; no answer is assumed. The guard uses
|
||||
public configuration, never Stone Burner's hidden custody. CHOAM without
|
||||
Richese remains eligible. This is a development boundary, not a printed ban.
|
||||
- Co-present reciprocal Ecaz allied armies on either side reject before
|
||||
sealing; other faction integration gates remain in force. This prototype does not settle Ecaz's undialed allied support allocation.
|
||||
- Co-present armies remain guarded in Basic or without the supported Advanced
|
||||
Occupy profile. The [combined-army follow-up](ECAZ_OCCUPY_RULES.md#independent-cards-with-combined-armies--2-october-2026)
|
||||
returns only actual card-user forces: original fixed Ecaz commitment or the
|
||||
selected ally's native variable commitment. It never returns the other ally
|
||||
or recomputes mandatory fixed losses from the diminished board.
|
||||
- [Bounded Reinforcements](REINFORCEMENTS_RUNTIME.md) can appear in the
|
||||
opposing Battle Plan in classic-faction Basic/Advanced games. The two cards
|
||||
cannot share one player's plan; their relative same-plan timing remains
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user