Update the goal objective and synchronized repository guidance at the user's request. Remove the weekly usage cutoff, routine account-usage checks and mandatory token-counter tracking while retaining efficient work, verified Git pushes and selective subagents. The objective file remains outside the repository; private before/after copies are saved. Keep existing AI profiles and minimal legal participation for feature testing and critical correctness fixes. Defer full AI implementation, strategic refinement and calibration until all non-AI game features are complete. Then aim for approximately 75% higher-tier wins separately for Medium/Easy, Hard/Medium and Brutal/Hard in balanced pairwise evaluations, with swapped factions/seats, independent evaluation seeds and reported uncertainty. Preserve broader multiplayer acceptance, hidden-information boundaries and human-seat pacing. Historical calibration results are not evidence of these targets. Documentation-only validation: reviewed the changed instructions, checked 73 local links, verified all three target pairs and preserved Git/subagent requirements, and passed git diff --check. No runtime behavior changed; tests/build were not rerun.
52 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
52 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# AI development order and difficulty targets
|
||
|
||
Updated 20 September 2026 at the user's request. This is the current development
|
||
plan; the [earlier calibration studies](AI_CALIBRATION.md) are historical results,
|
||
not evidence that the new targets have been met.
|
||
|
||
## Complete the game features first
|
||
|
||
Full AI implementation, strategic refinement and difficulty tuning start only
|
||
after all non-AI game features are complete: Basic and Advanced rules, all twelve
|
||
factions, the three expansions, applicable optional modules and interactions,
|
||
multiplayer functions and the required player-facing features. Do not spend time
|
||
tuning strategy against incomplete rules.
|
||
|
||
Until then, preserve existing profiles and provide only the minimal legal AI
|
||
participation needed to exercise new features. Fix crashes, deadlocks, illegal
|
||
actions, privacy violations and saved-continuation failures. Focused legal-action
|
||
and complete-game smoke checks remain appropriate; strength studies and tuning
|
||
are deferred. Working AI paths remain part of a connected feature prototype.
|
||
|
||
## Tune the completed game
|
||
|
||
Finish faction/module strategy, planning, risk assessment and negotiation, then
|
||
aim for these separate adjacent-pair results:
|
||
|
||
| Matchup | Target |
|
||
| --- | --- |
|
||
| Medium against Easy | Medium wins approximately 75% |
|
||
| Hard against Medium | Hard wins approximately 75% |
|
||
| Brutal against Hard | Brutal wins approximately 75% |
|
||
|
||
These are statistical targets over repeated games, not a promise for every four
|
||
games or a 75% overall win rate in a table containing all four difficulties.
|
||
|
||
Use legal head-to-head configurations with balanced faction/seat assignments,
|
||
swapped assignments and multiple seeds. Keep evaluation seeds separate from
|
||
tuning, report sample sizes and uncertainty, and break results down by rules
|
||
configuration so aggregate wins do not hide a broken matchup. Define outcome
|
||
accounting before running the evaluation and report draws or shared wins
|
||
explicitly. Do not treat unfinished or failed games as ordinary wins or losses.
|
||
|
||
Separately verify the completed strategies in supported two-through-six-player
|
||
tables, including alliances and expansion/module combinations. Pairwise strength
|
||
does not establish multiplayer competence. Preserve private information, legal
|
||
resources and the authoritative rules at every level; never give higher levels
|
||
unauthorized information or rule exceptions to reach a target. Retain the
|
||
existing 1–2 second action pacing when AI plays a human-owned seat.
|
||
|
||
Final AI acceptance needs measured evidence for all three approximate 75% targets
|
||
after feature completion, plus legal continuation across the requested scope.
|
||
The current policies and old studies do not satisfy that acceptance gate.
|