53 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
# Public deal records
|
|
|
|
## Source and prototype scope — 28 October 2026
|
|
|
|
**Prototyped / Partial.** The [publisher's 2019 rulebook](https://www.gf9games.com/dunegame/wp-content/uploads/Dune-Rulebook.pdf)
|
|
permits public deals between nonallied players, requires legal terms to be
|
|
honored, voids impossible parts and permits release by agreement. Its bribery
|
|
rules prohibit transfers of cards, leaders, forces and faction powers and
|
|
terms that contradict the rules. The user-supplied revised rulebook, physical
|
|
p. 16 (printed p. 14), records the same principles. This implementation does
|
|
not interpret written terms or decide whether they are legal or impossible.
|
|
|
|
Two to six human seats can record public written terms during play, including
|
|
while a game decision is open. Every pair must be nonallied when the offer is
|
|
made and when each acceptance is recorded. This pairwise interpretation of a
|
|
multi-party offer is provisional; the printed rules do not settle its exact
|
|
online form. The proposer is implicitly in agreement. All recipients must
|
|
accept for the record to become active; any may decline while it remains open,
|
|
and the proposer may withdraw it. Each participant can request or withdraw a
|
|
release; all must agree before release. Existing agreements can still be
|
|
released if participants subsequently become allies. Records remain active
|
|
until unanimously released, even after the players consider terms fulfilled.
|
|
Their text is public to the whole table.
|
|
|
|
The record itself moves no spice and creates no automatically enforced game
|
|
action. Players remain responsible for honoring valid terms, and an impossible
|
|
part is void under the rules. Existing [bribe controls](BRIBE_CONTROLS.md)
|
|
make actual eligible payments into the recipient's deferred Mentat supply.
|
|
Automatic interpretation, enforcement and impossibility handling,
|
|
AI negotiation and complete multiplayer/deployed acceptance remain
|
|
open. The text interface is an online convention, not a publisher ruling.
|
|
|
|
The action uses the normal seat authentication and room version fence. Older
|
|
two-party records retain their original serialized form and actions. Game
|
|
state carries an additive public ledger; it does not replace the native phase,
|
|
decision, private information or physical components.
|
|
|
|
The multiparty follow-up passes 28 cases in four related unit files and two
|
|
isolated authenticated HTTP cases, including three signatories across separately
|
|
authenticated faction seats. This does not certify all game combinations.
|
|
An isolated browser room exercised three-party acceptance and unanimous release
|
|
across four human faction seats. The subsequent allied-acceptance control was
|
|
verified by a focused component test rather than that browser run.
|
|
|
|
Seven related unit files pass 43 cases, including a native Truthtrance response
|
|
continuation; an isolated authenticated HTTP case covers three public views,
|
|
seat-authorized consent, release and subsequent play. The UI tests cover
|
|
proposer and recipient controls and a persistent action-needed notice. This
|
|
evidence does not certify arbitrary written terms or complete game modes.
|
|
An isolated browser room exercised offer, acceptance and mutual release between
|
|
two controlled faction seats, including the automatic response notice, distinct
|
|
faction labels and a result that remains visible until the player closes it.
|